From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Dec 11 19: 9:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5F914CE0 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 19:09:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA03062; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 19:07:16 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912120307.TAA03062@implode.root.com> To: wonko@entropy.tmok.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM System In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Dec 1999 13:37:22 EST." <199912111837.NAA64072@entropy.tmok.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 19:07:16 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >looking through the NetBSD Web Site they were advertising some new-fangled >VM SubSystem. calling it UVM. has anybody reviewed it for consideration in >rolling it into FreeBSD or has that been done already? if not, what are the >differences between the current VM system and this UVM (assuming of course >that someone has looked at the code) > >just curious. FreeBSD developed a 'new' VM system as well, but it has stronger Mach ties. We like our VM system, think it works better than anything else out there, and don't intend to switch to anything else. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message