Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:27:43 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
Cc:        gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Issues with 2.24 upgrade
Message-ID:  <1231709263.35607.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090111210909.31B451CC0B@ptavv.es.net>
References:  <20090111210909.31B451CC0B@ptavv.es.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-QdYapGwZ3PS6NY4kR4lE
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 13:09 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I have upgraded two systems following the instructions in UPDATING and
> have some issues. I'm not too sure of the significance, but I want ed
> report them.
>=20
> One system is new (as of Dec. 20) with gnome2, gnome2-office,
> gnome2-powertools and gnome2-fifth-toe installed from ports.
>=20
> First, when I ran 'pkgdb -Ff', I got:
> Duplicated origin: x11-toolkits/gtk20 - gail-1.22.3 gtk-2.14.7
> Unregister any of them? [no]=20

gail was absorbed into gtk20.  So the proper answer is yes, and to
unregister gail.  This should be the default if you answer yes to this
first question.

>=20
> I had no idea which, if either to unregister. Similar message on
> fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3 and gdm. I did not unregister any of
> them and proceeded to deinstall gtkmm and run the big portupgrade.

The same is true for gdm and fusa.  Unregister fusa, and keep gdm.

>=20
> At the end of the upgrade, I got the following messages:
> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
>  * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gail-1.22.3)
>  * x11/gdm (fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3)
>  ! x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.22.3_1) (install error)
>=20
> I ran pkgdb -Ff again and then I unregistered gail. Most (all?) gnome
> ports had the dependency corrected. I think that this was not a problem,
> but it was something I was unsure of.
>=20
> I then re-installed gnome2 and all appeared to be OK. I finally did
> 'portupgrade gnome-session'. This was a no-op and gnome-session had
> already been upgraded, so I did 'portupgrade -f gnome-session'. If this
> was what was expected, I think UPDATING should be updated to reflect
> this as well as the issue of the pkgdb run.

Yeah.

Joe

--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-QdYapGwZ3PS6NY4kR4lE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAklqZE4ACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4f/HgCeJgYBt2FZHnc82T7EeERpT9h+
gRUAoIW4Tm7D/ZNqcwhQWP+j64dDBIHJ
=PkQE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-QdYapGwZ3PS6NY4kR4lE--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1231709263.35607.7.camel>