Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:13:15 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes... Message-ID: <20110714141315.11192skc1c6286l7@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <ivmgad$h72$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> <CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca%2Bxvay73EeYen%2Buw2Ng@mail.gmail.com> <ivmgad$h72$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:25 +0200): > On 12/07/2011 16:06, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 28 June 2011 02:08, Jeremy Chadwick<freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote: >>> >>> On what exact OS version? Please don't say "8.2", need to know >>> 8.2-RELEASE, -STABLE, or what. You said "8.x" above, which is too >>> vague. If 8.2-STABLE you should not be tuning vm.kmem_size_max at all, >>> and you probably don't need to tune vm.kmem_size either. >> >> We don't do 8.2-STABLE, it's 8-STABLE.... > > Yeah, but colloquially "8.2-STABLE" means "8-STABLE in between 8.2 > and 8.3 releases"... it's not a new thing. It can also be that "RELENG_8_2" respectively "releng/8.2" is meant (to speak in VCS terms), or 8.2pX if you want to stay in the user-visible version terminology. I agree that this does not make sense in this context, but in the global FreeBSD context I've seen use of it like this too. Bye, Alexander. -- Anarchy may not be the best form of government, but it's better than no government at all. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110714141315.11192skc1c6286l7>