From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 16 19:14:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E78715217 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:12:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id EAA21036; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 04:12:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: dg@root.com Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , "Daniel O'Connor" , current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: latest -current doesn't execute BSDI-binary bladeenc References: <199903170258.SAA01200@implode.root.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 17 Mar 1999 04:12:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: David Greenman's message of "Tue, 16 Mar 1999 18:58:33 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Greenman writes: > If the remaining userland issues are dealt with, then perhaps. It is > currently necessary to rebuild certain utilities after changing this, > however, so making it a simple kernel compile time option isn't sufficient. Are these crash-and-burn-class problems, or is it just a matter of ps and top not working? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message