From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Sep 30 6:13:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de (rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de [194.95.108.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F6637B502 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 06:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de (feyrer@rfhpc8320 [194.95.108.32]) by rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e8UDCP013873; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 15:12:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from feyrer@localhost) by rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de (8.9.1/8.8.3) id PAA05519; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 15:15:15 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 15:15:15 +0200 (MET DST) From: Hubert Feyrer X-Sender: feyrer@rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de To: Will Andrews Cc: op-tech@openpackages.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: :C/// regex for make(1) In-Reply-To: <20000929212636.Q75085@puck.firepipe.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > I've reviewed your PR#21605 and have only one objection: the #ifndef > NO_REGEX parts. I don't see the point in having this (and others have > concurred). Is there something I missed about when someone may not want > regex support in make(1)? I've left the #ifdef in as it's in the NetBSD code. I can only guess that the reason is to make it easier to bootstrap make(1) on systems that don't have regexp routines. Seeing that FreeBSD has dropped all the bootstrapping code, it's probably best to just put in the code unconditionally. > As soon as I can get -current working on my laptop again I'll test your > changes and do a closer review of the code. Then commit, pending any > changes. OK - maybe let me know when you're done. FYI, I've tested this with 4.0-STABLE. - Hubert -- Hubert Feyrer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message