Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:20:32 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20121010062031.GI8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <1TLidW-000EbL-Lp@internal.tormail.org> References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org> <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org> <20121006080539.GB30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5070A018.9010302@FreeBSD.org> <20121008035621.GA91369@FreeBSD.org> <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org> <20121009161009.GF8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <1TLidW-000EbL-Lp@internal.tormail.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ijf6z65S790CMqo8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:51:07PM -1000, Jan Beich wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>=20
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:59:46PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:12:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:56:21AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >> > > That's because OptionsNG poorly implement mutually exclusive optio=
ns. I
> >> > > hope that eventually dialog's --radiolist would be utilized for pr=
oper
> >> > > handling, and sane knobs names would be restored.
> >> > >=20
> >> > > Sounds like a nice port junior hacker project.
> >> >=20
> >> > Not hat junior dialog(1) can't mix radiolist and classic checklist t=
hat is
> >> > why it doesn't use it, using libdialog(3), it would be easiy to impl=
ement,
> >> > but that won't be usable for a while (until all supported version of
> >> > freebsd has it.
> >>=20
> >> Ah, OK, that explains it (lack of radiobuttons now). Is it known what=
's
> >> preventing all supported versions to have working libdialog(3), if we =
have
> >> working dialog(1) already?
> >>=20
> >> ./danfe
> >
> > new dialog is only on 9.x and 10.x, if will require to code some special
> > dialog(1) dedicated for ports, MFCing libdialog to 8 and 7 is complicat=
ed
> > because the API isn't compatible.
>=20
> Why not add devel/cdialog to bootstrap on < 9.0 and install it only when
> BATCH is not set?
>=20
That do not change the fact that ${SOMEONE} will have to code a dialog(1)
dedicated for ports, the library is able to let us mix radio and check, but=
the
frontend (dialog(1)) is still not able to.
if someone stepup to do it, I'll be more than happy :)
regards,
Bapt
--ijf6z65S790CMqo8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlB1E68ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Exb2wCdGD/0f/IHqP5JePcm4+KDxvge
wZsAnA9LqzwAsSInaf0jYSy/NqOZHcPC
=svdY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ijf6z65S790CMqo8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121010062031.GI8713>