From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 16 05:17:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D0837B401 for ; Fri, 16 May 2003 05:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57C943F93 for ; Fri, 16 May 2003 05:17:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 0773B530E; Fri, 16 May 2003 14:17:56 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Daniel C. Sobral" References: <200305152344.h4FNi4gN032787@grimreaper.grondar.org> <3EC4D566.5070306@tcoip.com.br> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:17:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3EC4D566.5070306@tcoip.com.br> (Daniel C. Sobral's message of "Fri, 16 May 2003 09:11:18 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: arch@freebsd.org cc: Mark Murray Subject: Re: NOCRYPT / NOSECURE X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:17:59 -0000 "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: > 1) What happens if I compile with no crypto (whatever it is/will be > called these days)? Exactly the same as currently - you don't get to use the x command (read/write encrypted files). The only change is that ed(1) now uses libcrypt instead of libcipher (which was intended as a lightweight exportable libcrypt replacement AFAIK). > 2) ed(1) is /bin/ed. Won't that cause trouble? No. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org