From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 28 13:33:50 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9081716A4CE; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:33:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DB9CF43D46; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:33:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2SDXcti031971;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:33:38 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: ticso@cicely.de
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:13:19 +0200."
             <20050328131318.GC14532@cicely12.cicely.de> 
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:33:38 +0200
Message-ID: <31970.1112016818@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
cc: Vladimir Grebenschikov <vova@fbsd.ru>
cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject: Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it
	possible ? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:33:50 -0000

In message <20050328131318.GC14532@cicely12.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter writes:
>On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <20050328114633.GZ14532@cicely12.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter writes:
>> 
>> >> camcontrol detach da0; camcontrol rescan all 
>> >> helps, but, it should be much better if it will be issued automatically.
>> >
>> >Yes - GEOM seems to ignore media change signals from drives.
>> >I've added PHK to the recipient list - maybe he has an idea about this
>> >problem.
>> 
>> No, GEOM doesn't ignore any such thing, because as far as I know
>> GEOM doesn't get any such thing to ignore in the first place.
>
>At least with (most) SCSI devices you get a media changed exception
>on the first access after that.

Yes, but sane people would argue that is one turn too late in the
game, whouldn' they ?

We should get an async event as soon as the media disappears.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.