From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Feb 19 22:53: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F49137B401 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:53:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f1K6qnw40602; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:52:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:52:49 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200102200652.f1K6qnw40602@earth.backplane.com> To: Terry Lambert Cc: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein), josb@cncdsl.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND References: <200102200251.TAA06099@usr05.primenet.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> :to the unaltered DJBDNS code, since the binaries of the modified :> :code themselves are not permitted to be redistributed. :> :> It means nothing of the sort. Unless DJBDNS explicitly says that :> a change of ownership (company bought, merger,... ) requires doing :> the above very silly thing, there is no legal risk whatsoever. :> A company being sold to another company is a very, very, very :> different beast then a company selling software commercially. : :Selling the company transfers ownership of the binaries. : : : Terry Lambert : terry@lambert.org Look Terry, I went through one of those damn aquisitions... AND a merger, with BEST. I know you really want to make a mountain out of a molehill but all you are doing here is creating confusion over a non-issue. It is unnecessary. There is no problem here and there never was. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message