From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 2 09:45:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806B316A420 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:45:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0277143D45 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:45:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so384218nzn for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:45:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EauANpffrv1NTJIogXWVB91YmZ2gqcD6HbyirDaeIx48Ou4yHQ1wfIWIKmLQFdCAbQsDC5kP5bLTGQgwFuqESoXVXFi3rcMmFVPXPbZCQZLcukRB9zxLw4utv3Heo5fkOwuHGIe8mBh4asIdiwsmWquHoSUTOAlzNw/Q7gTKCAg= Received: by 10.36.222.25 with SMTP id u25mr1568388nzg; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:45:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 01:45:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:45:55 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: Peter In-Reply-To: <20060302051126.14057.qmail@web60021.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060302051126.14057.qmail@web60021.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: anyone using portsman? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:45:56 -0000 On 3/2/06, Peter wrote: > I'm investigating the ports management utility > "portsman" but the thing seems broken. I just updated > my 5.4 tree via cvsup, fetched the INDEX file (make > fetchindex), and built the INDEX database INDEX.db > (portsdb -u). > > Running portsman I get: > > Checking state of /usr/ports/INDEX-5... > Please stand by while portsman is coming up... > error: INDEX file seems to be corrupted or is of an > unknown format.n? Why would the INDEX.db format be the same for portupgrade and portsman?