From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 09:49:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C2716A41F for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:49:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from V.Konrad@lse.ac.uk) Received: from exic6.lse.ac.uk (exic6.lse.ac.uk [158.143.217.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BC343D49 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:49:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from V.Konrad@lse.ac.uk) Received: from ExF1.lse.ac.uk ([158.143.216.11]) by exic6.lse.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:49:23 +0100 Received: exchange.lse.ac.uk 158.143.216.11 from 158.143.216.102 158.143.216.102 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.0.6249 Received: 158.143.216.102 158.143.216.102 from 158.143.201.41 158.143.201.41 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.0.6249 Received: from whirpool.lse.ac.uk by exchange.lse.ac.uk; 27 Oct 2005 10:48:46 +0100 From: Vladimir Konrad To: Brooks Davis In-Reply-To: <20051017180519.GA15097@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <1129279679.1317.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <003b01c5d0a3$a6250da0$0200a8c0@bennypc> <1129283233.1315.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051014091016.J71298@kerplunk.tbe.net> <20051017180519.GA15097@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:48:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1130406526.1322.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2005 09:49:23.0692 (UTC) FILETIME=[B60CEAC0:01C5DADB] Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sil3114 versus sil3114a X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:49:26 -0000 > You're confusing the 3114 with the 3112. I don't recall any 3114 > issues. They are entierly different beasts. The big problem here is > that the 3112 is "value" hardware where apparent functionality under > Windows at the lowest possible price is far more important than actually > writing your bits to the disk correctly so people keep building cards > around cheap, bad hardware. :( thank you for the clarification. vlad