From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 22:31:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721F316A41F; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:31:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from cs.rice.edu (cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A29543D6D; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:31:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from localhost (calypso.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.127]) by cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1414AA2E; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:31:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from cs.rice.edu ([128.42.1.30]) by localhost (calypso.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.127]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31459-01-22; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:31:35 -0600 (CST) Received: by cs.rice.edu (Postfix, from userid 19572) id B23414AA5A; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:31:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:31:35 -0600 From: Alan Cox To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20060117223135.GB2360@cs.rice.edu> References: <43CD612E.2060002@elischer.org> <63333.1137536336@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63333.1137536336@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-2.2.1 at cs.rice.edu Cc: alc@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large virtual page size support. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:31:37 -0000 On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:18:56PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <43CD612E.2060002@elischer.org>, Julian Elischer writes: > >Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > >> I have implemented support in the vm for PAGE_SIZE values which are a > >> multiple of the hardware page size. This is primarily useful for two > >> things: > > > >Mach (and the VM system we inherrited from it) had this. I beieve it was > >removed with teh comment > >"If we need this and someone is willing to support it it can be added > >back" . > > It was a VAX artifact and not very usable. I belive we have a couple > of comments and macros which still talk about "clicks". > It was not a VAX artifact. Also, Jeff's work differs significantly from what Mach did on the VAX. I'll explain the differences after my paper deadline passes tomorrow. Alan