From owner-freebsd-audit Fri Jun 22 9:41: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from coffee.q9media.com (coffee.q9media.com [216.94.229.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B7037B403; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:40:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@q9media.com) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (vega.tct.net [216.94.230.13]) by coffee.q9media.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5MGrPL85381; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:53:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@q9media.com) User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:40:58 -0400 Subject: Re: whois(1) patch From: Mike Barcroft To: Cc: Mike Heffner , Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20010622032318.A506@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Organization: q9 media Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6/22/01 6:23 AM, David O'Brien at obrien@freebsd.org wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 06:26:06PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote: >> I think there was also talk of doing a full sweep to remove __P. > > Yes. Lets plan for a sweep in 6mo. or so and make the conversion. > Many of us don't want the CSRG derived sources in various forms -- they > should be kept consistent. Perhaps we should also remove the register storage-classes at that time. The best time to do this is probably right before 5.0 enters BETA, as to reduce the differences between -STABLE and -CURRENT. Is that your thinking as well? Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message