From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 31 05:35:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA25430 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 05:35:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mx.symbol.com (mx.symbol.com [204.241.44.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA25422 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 05:35:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from STODOLSK@symbol.com) Received: by mx.symbol.com; id IAA00051; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 08:35:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from proxy.symbol.com(157.235.5.10) by mx.symbol.com via smap (4.1) id xma000007; Sat, 31 Oct 98 08:34:38 -0500 Received: from roadrunner.symbol.com (roadrunner.symbol.com [157.235.20.248]) by proxy.symbol.com (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA16623 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 08:34:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from ENG-DOM-Message_Server by roadrunner.symbol.com with Novell_GroupWise; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 08:37:15 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1 Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 08:36:43 -0500 From: Al Stodolski To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Linux emulation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there a compromise in performance for anyone who runs Linux apps using emulation in FreeBSD? I'm finding very few apps out there built specifically for FreeBSD. I'm recalling how badly the Mac OS ran Windows apps using an emulation package called SoftPC. Thanks to anyone responding Albert Stodolski stodolsk@symbol.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message