From owner-cvs-ports  Fri Mar  7 00:12:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA25302
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 00:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA25291;
          Fri, 7 Mar 1997 00:12:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA12077; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 00:12:27 -0800 (PST)
To: Thomas Gellekum <tg@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/bsvc Makefile 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 07 Mar 1997 00:05:12 PST."
             <199703070805.AAA24893@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 1997 00:12:27 -0800
Message-ID: <12063.857722347@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> tg          97/03/07 00:05:11
> 
>   Modified:    emulators/bsvc  Makefile
>   Log:
>   ${RM} -> ${RM} -f.

That was reason #1. :-)

My other feeling was that generating a temporary patch actually *in*
the patches directory was kind of evil, and if I had to do it I'd
simply generate the patch under ${WRKDIR} and add a post-patch target
for it rather than a pre-clean target.  Maybe I'm just being
anal-retentive, but it would make more sense given the presence of the
pre-patch rule. :-)

					Jordan