Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 18:45:08 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: langfod@dihelix.com (David Langford) Cc: sef@kithrup.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org, michaelh@cet.co.jp Subject: Re: vfork cow? Message-ID: <199606190145.SAA11744@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199606180404.SAA09946@caliban.dihelix.com> from "David Langford" at Jun 17, 96 06:04:38 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Keith or Kirk mentioned, at one point, possibly going back to the old > >semantics; this is useful for large-memory processes, depending on the > >implementation. (John and David just did some work to improve pmap_copy, > >which helps address this issue. However, let's get a few processes with > >2GBytes of address space active, and see how well it does ;).) > > > >Sean. > > Um. Try running Altavista on you machine ..... :) Altavista runs on FreeBSD?!?!?!?!?!?!? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606190145.SAA11744>