From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jan 12 20:29:08 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA18182
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 20:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id UAA18174
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 20:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA24056; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 20:28:41 -0800 (PST)
To: Heikki Suonsivu <hsu@clinet.fi>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Is it really going to be /usr/bin/ee ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Jan 1997 04:06:37 +0200."
             <199701130206.EAA19310@smile.clinet.fi> 
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 20:28:40 -0800
Message-ID: <24052.853129720@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> If the size of the editor is the problem, could the keyboard mappings
> be copied from pico or emacs so that it would be in line with other
> common software ? 

ee supports emacs-style keymaps already.  Perhaps that should simply
be the default?

I've no great attachment to ee, it was simply the easiest-to-incorporate
editor I'd found with its keymap selections on-screen at all times.

						Jordan