Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 08:58:45 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> Cc: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>, "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, "ohauer@FreeBSD.org" <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: USERS/GROUPS in bsd.port.mk [was: FreeBSD Port: postfix-2.8.4, 1] Message-ID: <417028BC-447C-45DF-ACC3-A6CCFE614AA0@tandon.net> In-Reply-To: <20110802010139.GA981@magic.hamla.org> References: <4E368625.7010805@quip.cz> <4E370ADA.9060902@FreeBSD.org> <4E371284.5010806@quip.cz> <4E371B3B.7070806@FreeBSD.org> <4E3722DE.6050206@gmx.de> <20110802010139.GA981@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote: >=20 >> No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in >> the Framework! >>=20 >> =46rom the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored. >=20 > Along those lines, what about using groupmod instead of usermod? > Perhaps due to my ignorance, it seems more straightforward and does not > require much sed-fu; I've attached a (probably incomplete) patch to > illustrate my thinking. I understand what I am suggesting could > introduce other problems, so please do not construe it as an as-is > suggestion, but rather something to stoke discussion. And it would help if I did not transmit horribly mangled patches! Sorry abo= ut that, please see: http://people.freebsd.org/~sahil/2011-08-02/bsd.port.mk.diff.txt -- Sahil Tandon=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?417028BC-447C-45DF-ACC3-A6CCFE614AA0>