Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:34:02 +0200 From: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 Message-ID: <20080608213401.GA74048@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20080608205506.GI67629@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20080608154920.GA8266@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20080608205506.GI67629@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:55:06AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2008-Jun-08 17:49:20 +0200, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> wrote: > >and it is now working perfectly well without any trouble. The only > >"gotcha" is the slowness of X problem when compiling, but i live with that. > > Have you tried SCHED_ULE? In my experience, it does a better job of > scdeduling than SCHED_4BSD, even on UP machines (YMMV). Yes, i run with SCHED_ULE, the machine is less interactive than with 6.2 when compiling, but, as i said, i don't care much about that. What i really don't like is panicking, and with 7.0 my machine is perfectly stable. On the other hand, many tasks run very fast under 7.0, so, overall i am very happy with this version. -- Michel TALON
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080608213401.GA74048>