From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 11 22:37:39 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD3F10656A4
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151908FC15
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:37:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37])
	by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p0BM0IX6025996
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:00:18 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9])
	by mail.cicely.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0BM0FUg031730
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:00:15 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p0BM0EQg047994;
	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:00:14 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
	by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id p0BM0E9g047993;
	Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:00:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:00:14 +0100
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Message-ID: <20110111220014.GY39356@cicely7.cicely.de>
References: <1512738982.20110111124729@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<20110111163825.GF7511@numachi.com>
	<76226157.20110111222913@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<773123481.20110111223731@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <773123481.20110111223731@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI
	MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider
	discard FreeBSD support due this bug)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:37:39 -0000

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:37:31PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Brian.
> You wrote 11 ?????? 2011 ?., 22:29:13:
> 
> >   basic mode:   100 Mbit, full duplex
> >   link partner: 100baseTx-HD
>   It looks VERY strange. How could id be?

This is normal if the link partner doesn't do autonegotiation.
The system has to assume a simple repeater hub and do half duplex.
If on the other hand the switch is hard set to full-duplex then they
can't expect autonegotiation to do it right.
However hard setting under FreeBSD as well should work.

-- 
B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.