From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 12 21:23:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA23351 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 21:23:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cyclops.xtra.co.nz (cyclops.xtra.co.nz [202.27.184.96]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA23339 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 21:23:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from junkmale@pop3.xtra.co.nz) Received: from wocker (210-55-210-87.ipnets.xtra.co.nz [210.55.210.87]) by cyclops.xtra.co.nz (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA22957; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:22:31 +1300 (NZDT) Message-Id: <199811130522.SAA22957@cyclops.xtra.co.nz> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: DVL Software Limited To: Tim Moony Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:23:44 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Networkink FBSD and WIn95 Reply-to: junkmale@xtra.co.nz CC: questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have not seen your original post. On 12 Nov 98, at 20:32, Tim Moony wrote: > But I thought that's only needed when I am dealing with non-realistic IPs. > > Before I have DSL, I had PPP account with multiple IPs and I just connect > the crossover cable between the NICs on my two FBSD machines: no NATD > needed. I don't know how that worked. But perhaps you were using aliasing within PPP? > The method depicted on www.freebsddiary.com was to redirect the traffic to > two machines without real IP. Is my understanding to the problem correct? Yes. That is correct. I don't know your setup, so I cannot comment upon what you should do. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary http://www.FreeBSDDiary.com/freebsd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message