Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 07:54:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Graham Bentley <admin@cpcnw.co.uk> Subject: Re: YASSDQ Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207090733440.56012@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207091228280.41445@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20120708120028.99568106568F@hub.freebsd.org> <1211EED02D7F4079B279A9D413857ECF@admin> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207082058120.51462@wonkity.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207091228280.41445@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> Notes: >> >> 1. SSDs don't necessarily use 4k blocks, some use larger ones. Starting the > > All use 4K as it is NTFS default block size and most are sold to be used with > windoze. No. For example, some of the Crucial M4 drives are 4K, some are 8K. >> first filesystem partition at 1M works for most of the common values. > > Alignment of filesystem cannot be better than it's block size. 1M is semi-standard and aligns with all expected block sizes and erase block sizes.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207090733440.56012>