From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 17 18:57:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F0386E; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olavgg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com (mail-lb0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D3FF14; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y8so1950843lbh.35 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:57:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mw2I0RxmTXMMUU+lznyV93bstIfe74XREJN2us3bv8A=; b=G+hVf5U4kpFzalv9dh/cTUFJemPjWsuIc5u1AybVGpR8k1GmHAolzvlmRuNriuTCDI VrVm07Vz+tYAhWck0Z+tjuLyeI7tnf6Vo//8zSgGd+zwYwNBOzqbX7qb1cm48dub0Hjm kDXWKqvU561laQyYaCxFSuZNJkucsqT8zkX2B/Exlr5uLHJwo+NnHFrbSQYRQ4gWFsdg 3Yfw5dwg4D77Zpia9OKgIkX0tLjhYumeryIQC3FG2r5Z57/ZiSnPUKK6ND6KsGMflzXO Bd0mY4ct1xmkncK1/HRweJkrCUOZ65tDWG0aOTBRVGH4biQi+UqAY30upSHAnuJ4oqcL +RaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.157.165 with SMTP id wn5mr4195972lbb.29.1366225042783; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.23.232 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:57:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130417181631.GA29166@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20130417181631.GA29166@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:57:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olav_Gr=F8n=E5s_Gjerde?= To: Brooks Davis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:57:24 -0000 It was(sorry) from around 12th June 2012. But I have another system with 8.2-RELEASE that I can upgrade to a commit around 12th June 2012 and then try directly to 9-STABLE(or 8.3 first?) if that would be helpful? On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote: > > I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After > > around 5 minutes of compile time, the process just hangs on same place. > No > > error. I've tried compiling different commits from this week with the > same > > result. > > > > The part in the buildkernel process that hangs is this: > > MAKE=make sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh GENERIC > > /usr/local/bin/svnversion > > cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g > -Wall > > -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef > > -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs > > -fdiagnostics-show-option -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS > -include > > opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param > inline-unit-growth=100 > > --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer > -mcmodel=kernel > > -mno-red-zone -mno-mmx -mno-sse -msoft-float > > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -Werror > > vers.c > > ctfconvert -L VERSION -g vers.o > > linking kernel.debug > > ctfmerge -L VERSION -g -o kernel.debug ............+ alot of *.o > > > > Any suggestions? > > In the DTrace commit message thread, you mentioned that you were > upgrading from an old 8-STABLE to 9 when you got the hang. Could you > quantify how old that 8-STABLE was/is? If it's pre-8.3 it would be > really helpful if you could upgrade to 8.3 and test that. If that works > then I think a note in UPDATING would be sufficient as our historical > policy has been to support upgrading to release X.Y from > (X-1).. If it turns out that we need to upgrade to 8.4 we may > need to consider backing this out for a bit. > > -- Brooks >