From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 10:25:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6101065670; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (unknown [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F438FC19; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6BAPiLB010157; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:25:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m6BAPiIY010156; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:25:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:25:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200807111025.m6BAPiIY010156@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, kaluna@gmail.com, brooks@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <11c17ec30807110140xbeec510ke54eaf1829fc4894@mail.gmail.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-fs User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.2-STABLE-20070808 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:25:45 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: Filesystem is not clean - run fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, kaluna@gmail.com, brooks@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:25:47 -0000 Carlos Luna wrote: > Yes, that would be the case. There is a patch made by someone to the fsck to > "solve" this, but who made the pacth said too "expect lot loose of date", > son I'm just looking for a harmless solution. By the way I'm just triyng to > mount it read-only. You used fsck -y, so you should already expect to have lost data. Quoting from the manual page's description of the -y option: "this should be used with great caution as this is a free license to continue after essentially unlimited trouble has been encountered." Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "People still program in C. People keep writing shell scripts. *Most* people don't realize the shortcomings of the tools they are using because they a) don't reflect on their workflows and they are b) too lazy to check out alternatives to realize there is help." -- Simon 'corecode' Schubert