From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 28 15:43:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.wmptl.com (mail2.wmptl.com [216.221.73.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCB037B9C9 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:43:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from webmaster@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.com ([10.0.0.168]) by mail2.wmptl.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA72697; Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:14:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from webmaster@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <397C9C1F.F9A2380D@wmptl.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:42:23 -0400 From: Nathan Vidican X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "SILVER, MICHAEL A" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba vs NT References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "SILVER, MICHAEL A" wrote: > > Is anyone using Samba in a corporate environment instead of NT, with 95/98 > or NT workstations? Any luck? Any one convert from NT to Samba? Is there > anything to watch out for? I have client who might benefit from a move to > Samba from NT 3.51. > > ...Thanks... > ...Michael... > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message I use it at home, and at work. I find SAMBA works quite well, Just a bit of a pain setting up the login service(s). Once they're setup things are fine, and STABLE (there's a word that doesn't go well with NT). To be honest though, I've never used Samba under a heavy load driven environment, (were a Novell Netware/NT Workstation/Win9X office here with FreeBSD intranet/inter/web/email servers). -- Nathan Vidican webmaster@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message