From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 3 22:38:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9A416A4CE for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:38:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B0F543D39 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:38:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (mjeays2551@24.43.95.82 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Oct 2004 22:38:14 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: TM4525@aol.com In-Reply-To: <9d.4fabdbb7.2e91c892@aol.com> References: <9d.4fabdbb7.2e91c892@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1096843093.30508.48.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 03 Oct 2004 18:38:13 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When Unix Stops Being Fun X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 22:38:15 -0000 On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 17:26, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/3/04 4:31:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > bsilver@chrononomicon.com writes: > >Excuse me while I shred it before the Secret Service comes knocking on > >my door... > > Is the secret service in charge of counterfiting now? (as you can see no > formal education is required to be an SA....) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Anti-counterfeiting was one of the original purposes for which the Secret Service was formed. Be really careful about doing things like this - it is possible to get into a lot of trouble even with no criminal intent. As a purely theoretical question - is it possible to be guilty of an offence by being in possession of a digital image of a currency bill? At what resolution does it become an offence?