From owner-freebsd-arch Fri May 26 9:59:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA20A37BE51 for ; Fri, 26 May 2000 09:59:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p03-dn03kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.232.224.132]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id BAA06759; Sat, 27 May 2000 01:59:18 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <392E97B7.1A575FAC@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 00:26:47 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Paterson Cc: Matthew Dillon , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Terry Lambert , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Preemptive kernel on older X86 hardware References: <200005251700.LAA25373@berserker.bsdi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Chuck Paterson wrote: > > Almost.) I certainly think that the actually locking > stuff can be in a function but we really want to wrap the > function in a macro so we can put tracing in. Being able > to look at a trace and see file and line numbers for mutex > locks and unlocks is invaluable. Won't declaring the function as inline work? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@another.bsdconspiracy.org "Sentience hurts." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message