From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 30 18:56:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F96DE7 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F964DB2 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id v14so862526pde.32 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 11:56:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=f4dnFmKRhrpDmn0DrKgIyXegQ+ofVpn0t2KJXg9aTLU=; b=BdElYxT5kPX1mvDuGyzkS1EW+WGvjtiqG0bxn7BI8UXTlGheiYctyNdxlZBo0GXqvc t6ExHsllOC1+ZqHzcMuHMNLpUVO26SlVm1QnhmM7g5mvvSH+u6zWpB+EKFB6iSrkfBA3 Zf35mVfl9FfgiBac0TJQxz9pNTHtWGmsR128U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=f4dnFmKRhrpDmn0DrKgIyXegQ+ofVpn0t2KJXg9aTLU=; b=kERwdENxDTVtfUqhZL9I+5kVTscbnzZwtB6ryvtunwawU7HqlE6riUi4OI5dp436Wk w1xu1+PQUzUt/r7gL+ELrAeGJlw5ifrkCoeksV5hXsIVTw6nSogtF9UX5BiLQZb1nXJs tpfkcDn9aWbx3htgv1VmJBRQ921bNNQTCUk6m/+8Xml0MUbvl2euZdW3OgVwZKN8Ac1e VnFsr8F3b0Aw/DfXWQiGr9xfbUzpPgMB6jPAcLG4h/WqykrRcZX103mvqe1vF82YwU2K eSP3xO+y8MxHj2uaS5w2Hdej6HC33/dnnB0U3JD/YibPh2lThsVWENANc+GYLwg+rQAa K7cA== X-Received: by 10.68.170.68 with SMTP id ak4mr8940603pbc.211.1369940165680; Thu, 30 May 2013 11:56:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.70.91.139 with HTTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 11:55:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201305291541.r4TFf1PO037359@svn.freebsd.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 20:55:35 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Z8cK3-oSZj5e0Sps36iDY0L5Me8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r319380 - head/math/libtommath To: bf1783@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJujqcGZg0vX6V3jKrdtUfgwDZz77T+zdtS6irQewQvsp7GLOZmA8jZb3eji9fpzc86nZb Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Martin Wilke X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 18:56:11 -0000 On 30 May 2013 20:38, b.f. wrote: >> BROKEN is not used just because a port fails its regression tests but >> it isn't reserved just for build failures. > > Of course it isn't. My point was that even if the test failure > indicated a "failure of the actual program", it doesn't necessarily > mean that the port should be marked BROKEN, as you seemed to suggest. > It depends on the nature of the failure. Ah, I see. I was more concerned that regression test was disabled without looking into the nature of the failure. The commit log was not clear. That said, I think we have the answer from miwi@ already so it is a moot point. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams