From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 9 1:35:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from Wit401305.student.utwente.nl (wit401305.student.utwente.nl [130.89.236.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8E8153CB; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 01:35:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from daeron@Wit401305.student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (daeron@localhost) by Wit401305.student.utwente.nl (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA41271; Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:35:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from daeron@Wit401305.student.utwente.nl) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:35:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Hofstee To: Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SDL port done yet? In-Reply-To: <199906090829.QAA01572@ariadne.tensor.pgs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote: > Hmm. Has he merged the changes into the SDL codebase yet? (what is it, 0.9.13). Is anyone doing anything about the pthread_cancel calls? As far as I know the changes have been merged into the main SDL code base. (it was basically some very minor changes to the linux-code ... with a rewrite of the cd-audio code) ... as far as the pthread-concel functions are concerned ... i don't really know much about the current status on this issue. -------------------- Pascal Hofstee - daeron@shadowmere.student.utwente.nl -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s+: a-- C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W- N+ o? K- w--- O? M V? PS+ PE Y-- PGP-- t+ 5 X-- R tv+ b+ DI D- G e* h+ r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message