From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 08:06:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ED016A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:06:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487C143D49 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20040608080555011001arhse>; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:05:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA36692; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Daniel Eischen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: Sean McNeil cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:06:11 -0000 On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Daniel Eischen wrote: > [ trimmed to threads@ ] > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 00:32, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, Sean McNeil wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Up front, I'd like to make a few apologies: > > > > > > > > 1) I am sorry for the length of this email. > > > > 2) Although some very valid opinions have been expressed, I respectfully > > > > have to disagree. This email will hopefully strengthen my position. > > > > > > Please stop spamming multiple lists. > > > > > > No, I don't want to litter all our thread libraries with strong references. > > > As I've said before, build your shared libraries correctly so they don't > > > bring in the threads library. Can you explain to me in words of 1 sylable why libpthread should not have strong symbols? I haven't been following this argument.. > > > > In order to do this, I'm a strong proponent of making -pthread the > > default PTHREAD_LIBS from 4.X and 5.X. This will do the right thing in > > all cases, and reduces diffs among branches. What is keeping this from > > happening from a threading standpoint? > > Nothing from what I can see. > > -- > Dan Eischen > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >