From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Jan 18 0: 6:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A954337B400; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:06:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 887453E02; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:06:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from unixfreak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872D73C10A; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:06:20 -0800 (PST) To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: Dan Langille , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: too much confusion over kernel building In-Reply-To: Message from Neil Blakey-Milner of "Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:59:51 +0200." <20010118095951.A9023@rapier.smartspace.co.za> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:06:15 -0800 From: Dima Dorfman Message-Id: <20010118080620.887453E02@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > This is causing the problem: > > My reminder to Marcel and other hackers that this problem exists: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=729536+733077+/usr/local/www/db/t > ext/2000/cvs-all/20001224.cvs-all > > Marcel, the designer of the new system, saying that buildkernel should > revert to the running system in the absence of a populated /usr/obj: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=761905+765570+/usr/local/www/db/t > ext/2000/cvs-all/20001224.cvs-all > > A description of why 'nm' is failing: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=837688+841420+/usr/local/www/db/t > ext/2000/cvs-all/20001224.cvs-all Well, looks like the patch I just sent in response to one of Dan's messages does just that. :-) Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message