Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:41:44 +0200
From:      "Eirik A. Nygaard" <eirikald@pvv.ntnu.no>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Compiling kernel and userland with Intel C Compiler
Message-ID:  <20061004084144.GA673@litenbug.ycoll.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060928072349.0009n2tr9cwskswc@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <29073890609261304o777fd0fajecf43d10fc181177@mail.gmail.com> <f85d6aa70609270014y7db03169s95c682a9c0f984a6@mail.gmail.com> <20060927101733.pejhm56h0ks4cssk@webmail.leidinger.net> <20060927194837.GA14902@stud.ntnu.no> <20060928072349.0009n2tr9cwskswc@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:23:49AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> You are aware that any stuff needs to get committed to -current first?  
> And I don't see a _strong_ reason why this should be MFCed to 6-stable  
> when it is in 7-current. For this reasons it would be better to add  
> support to -current instead to 6.x.

Yes, I am aware of this. FreeBSD 6.x is what I have access to these days. So
that is what I have been using. There are still some troubles we need to work
out. When that is done I will start working on it and -CURRENT.

-- 
Eirik A. Nygaard



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061004084144.GA673>