Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 14:09:42 -0500 (EST) From: spork <spork@super-g.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC 1323 default settings (was Re: progress report on connection problems) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970129140422.2832A-100000@super-g.inch.com> In-Reply-To: <199701291723.KAA12168@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > Isn't this considered a bugfix, not an "upgrade"? Sorry if I was a bit harsh, but my blood boils whenever I think of these people. I would call it a bugfix, but the coincidence here is that it is fixed in the newer release (supposedly), so their opinion is "Hey, go buy the new release; you get more features *and* bugfixes"... Go to their page sometime and look at release notes; they are funny. In 9.2.something, you can crash an annex by fingering it.... Nice. > In any case, it seems that it's not a very good idea to calculate > the price of Annex hardware without including the cost of a "software > upgrade contract" in the total when comparing them to their competition. The simple thing to do is just to not buy their product. It is merely "OK" at best, and a nightmare on a bad day. One klunky 486 and 72 ports seems to be a bit of a stretch. Charles > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970129140422.2832A-100000>