From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 12:23:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4016316A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwall.in.markiza.sk (fwall.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0704943D49 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:23:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from corwin@pleiades.aeternal.net) Received: from pleiades.aeternal.net (pleiades.in.markiza.sk [192.168.13.7]) by fwall.in.markiza.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8662E23022; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:23:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pleiades.aeternal.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pleiades.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6C21703C; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from corwin@localhost) by pleiades.aeternal.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i39JPCgR013869; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:25:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from corwin) Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:25:12 +0200 From: Martin Hudec To: Andreas Davour Message-ID: <20040409192512.GB12347@pleiades.aeternal.net> References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Copyright: (C) 2004 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD pleiades.aeternal.net 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Hudec List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:23:58 -0000 Hi Andreas, don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory? Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled? cheers, Martin On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 08:55:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Andreas Davour wrote: > And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new > cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!? > > Can I get the atk ports from somewhere? Is it really needed? Why has it > dissapeared and why is it still mentioned as a dependency then? -- =-- : :. kind regards :.. Martin Hudec :.: :.: :m: +421.907.303393 :.: :@: corwin@aeternal.net :.: :w: http://www.aeternal.net