From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Jul 11 5:44:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from ns.skylink.it (ns.skylink.it [194.177.113.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B966E14D25 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 05:44:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hibma@skylink.it) Received: from heidi.plazza.it (va-153.skylink.it [194.185.55.153]) by ns.skylink.it (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA29153; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:44:20 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.plazza.it [127.0.0.1]) by heidi.plazza.it (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA00312; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:36:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:36:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Nick Hibma X-Sender: n_hibma@heidi.plazza.it Reply-To: Nick Hibma To: Francisco Reyes Cc: "freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Solved (was SMC EZcard or Linksys ethernet?) In-Reply-To: <199907100406.AAA07723@arutam.inch.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >> ed0 not found at 0x280 > >> I made the cards 280H, IRQ 5 and made sure that FreeBSD was looking for > >> them. > > I didn't have DOS on the FreeBSD machine and was configuring the cards > in a separate computer. Someone suggested that I use a boot floopy and > configure the cards in the FreeBSD box. As soon as I ran the card > configuration it complained about a conflict at 280H and made the > address 220. I changed FreeBSD to look for the card there and it > worked. Did you manage to figure out what was on 280H? ComX? Sometimes the ComX ports are very possessive and claim the port even when they are not switched on. Nick -- e-Mail: hibma@skylink.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message