From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Dec 9 16:12:42 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA17586 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 16:12:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.hsc.wvu.edu (www.hsc.wvu.edu [157.182.105.122]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA17569 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 16:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jsigmon@localhost) by www.hsc.wvu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA29904; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:11:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 19:11:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jeremy Sigmon To: Terry Lambert cc: J Wunsch , chat@freebsd.org, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: siguing into current from a random version In-Reply-To: <199612092228.PAA01956@phaeton.artisoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Voila, we have destroyed all of the rocks behind which tree-breakers > can hide. If person A breaks the tree, it will be obvious that it > is person A's fault, and the breakage can always be trivially undone > by backing up one write-lock-label. As an aside. At work we would use RCS to check in and out web pages so we would not step on each other. This worked until someone checked out a bunch of pages that they were "working on" and a few typos needed to be fixed. This locking feature quickly became annoying. :( I can definately see why the "volunteers" don't want to enable this.