From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 21:56:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E88716A41F for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:56:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2A843D45 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:56:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB0A6177; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:55:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -4.5/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF44D6152; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:55:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A32433C1D; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:56:03 +0200 (CEST) To: "Brian A. Seklecki" References: <20051007114027.Y95280@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> <86k6gp8fsf.fsf@xps.des.no> <20051007134804.F95280@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:56:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20051007134804.F95280@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> (Brian A. Seklecki's message of "Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:05:54 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <86br21800c.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_rootok(8) + pam.d/sudo symlink to pam.d/su X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:56:08 -0000 "Brian A. Seklecki" writes: > PAM doesn't cache authentication information does it? This > "use_first_pass" argument to modulesn't couldn't be getting in the way? use_first_pass means "use the password that was typed in previously", while try_first_pass means "try the password that was typed in previously, and if it doesn't match, ask again". I need to look at this again tomorrow when I'm slightly less inebriated... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no