Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:38:05 -0800 From: Tak Pui Lou <tplou@lbl.gov> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Porting PathScale's EKOPath Compiler Suite Message-ID: <08E5746B-621E-47D6-AE0E-8D359608284F@LBL.gov>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I have tested the port from = http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-devel-20111117.tar.bz2 and = http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/path64-20111115.tar.xz but the compiler = failed in the following tests: 3/6 Test #3: regression_tests .................***Failed 0.81 sec Start 4: hello_c 4/6 Test #4: hello_c .......................... Passed 0.14 sec Start 5: hello_cpp 5/6 Test #5: hello_cpp ........................ Passed 0.67 sec Start 6: path64_bootstrap_test 6/6 Test #6: path64_bootstrap_test ............***Failed 42.28 sec 67% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 6 Total Test time (real) =3D 44.74 sec The following tests FAILED: 3 - regression_tests (Failed) 6 - path64_bootstrap_test (Failed) Errors while running CTest Are these known errors for that build? I also tested it on a fortran code. Here is the runtime result: 0.923u /usr/local/path64/bin/pathf95 -O3 -LANG:copyinout=3DON:recursive=3D= ON -OPT:goto=3DON 1.283u gfortran46 -O3 I actually compiled gfortran with CLooG-PPL but the optimization flags = from GRAPHITE does not change the run time of this code.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?08E5746B-621E-47D6-AE0E-8D359608284F>