Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:32:57 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, "koziol@hdfgroup.org" <koziol@hdfgroup.org> Cc: "maho@FreeBSD.org" <maho@freebsd.org>, "thierry@FreeBSD.org" <thierry@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? Message-ID: <4DCB38C9.1040000@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu> References: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports? > > This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port > octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which > currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), and > the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function perfectly > well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf conflict > with each other. > > If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I > currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) > > Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? > > Thanks, Stephen > Well I feel pretty dumb. Actually it is my port, opendx, that needs the original hdf port. I forgot to enable "WITH_HDF" before testing it! Stephen Stephen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DCB38C9.1040000>