Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:01:21 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, stevefranks@ieee.org Subject: Re: includes, configure, /usr/lib vs. /usr/local/lib, and linux coders Message-ID: <200810312101.22605.tijl@ulyssis.org> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90810311230i11460966la7ff35b0093642ec@mail.gmail.com> References: <539c60b90810311123w2aa94b8akcd0a5d0fe791885a@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0810311154030.16737@zeno.ucsd.edu> <539c60b90810311230i11460966la7ff35b0093642ec@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 31 October 2008 20:30:46 Steve Franks wrote: > Let's backup. What's the 'right' way to get a bloody linux program > that expects all it's headers in /usr/include to compile on freebsd > where all the headers are in /usr/local/include? That's all I'm > really asking. Specifically, it's looking for libusb & libftdi. If > I just type gmake, it can't find it, but if I manually edit the > Makefiles to add -I/usr/local/include, it can. Obviously, manually > editing the makefiles is *not* the right way to fix it (plus it's > driving me crazy). ./configure CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" They should consider using pkg-config in their configure script to locate libusb and libftdi.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810312101.22605.tijl>