From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 8 07:03:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA05414 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lcurtis.intecom.com (lcurtis.intecom.com [192.246.135.12]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA05409 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (lcurtis@localhost) by lcurtis.intecom.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA00023 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 09:08:13 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: lcurtis.intecom.com: lcurtis owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 09:08:12 +03d-5 From: Leon Curtis To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Handling time after 1999 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have been asked to look into what other unix kernel groups are planning to do to address problems with time when the year 2000 arrives. I would appreciate any pointers that would enable me to get "plugged in" to any dialog / specifications relating to this issue. I work for a company that owns a version of (real time) unix put out by LynxOS (Los Gatos, California). Our PBX product runs this OS and will be the benefactor of the time changes. Thanks! __________________________________________________________________________ Leon Curtis lcurtis@intecom.com bus. (214) 447 8119 fax (214) 447 8603