From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Sun Oct 22 18:51:40 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A593CE3055B
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A5870C47
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v9MIpdg5099584
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:51:40 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 202367] sysutils/byobu relies on linprocfs at /proc
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:51:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: ultima@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-202367-13-1RpeRSr7Am@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-202367-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-202367-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 18:51:40 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D202367

--- Comment #10 from Richard Gallamore <ultima@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Justin Coffman from comment #9)
This looks much better. A the PORTREVISION will need to be bumped though. C=
an
you also provide some comments about QA?

It is really up to the maintainers judgement. If adding it to Makefile will
likely cause foreseeable future issues, then patchfile will probably be the
best route. Otherwise the former.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=