From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 6 13:33:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC4210656E8 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6918FC19 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1LqoxW-000Ou8-Ci; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:33:54 +0400 To: Andriy Gapon References: <49D9F14F.2000208@icyb.net.ua> <01986997@bb.ipt.ru> <49D9F4EE.4000004@icyb.net.ua> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:33:54 +0400 In-Reply-To: <49D9F4EE.4000004@icyb.net.ua> (Andriy Gapon's message of "Mon\, 06 Apr 2009 15\:26\:22 +0300") Message-ID: <69817709@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [qemu] raw_aio_remove: aio request not found! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:34:01 -0000 On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 06/04/2009 15:13 Boris Samorodov said the following: > > On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:10:55 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > >> I had two qemu crashes with the following diagnostics: > >> raw_aio_remove: aio request not found! > > > >> Unfortunately I wasn't able to obtain useful stack traces (no debug). > >> qemu was started as: > >> qemu-system-x86_64 -no-kqemu ... > >> This is amd64 stable/7 system (without VFS_AIO), qemu-0.10.1_1. > > > > May be a dumb question: is aio kldloaded? > Yes, it is loaded and it seems that it was loaded automatically (i.e. I didn't do > it explicitly). > BTW I thought that it was not needed for qemu-0.10, unlike qemu-0.9. Hm, I'd never used qemu-0.10 but with qemu-0.9 I'd been bitten by this several times. Sorry for the noise. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve