From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 12:26:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2542816A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se (pernis.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAFA43D55 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:26:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ante@update.uu.se) Received: by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 205D03F6; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:26:21 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by pernis.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s726; Fri, 9 Apr 04 21:24:57 +0200 Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (Tempo.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34ACC20; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:24:35 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from localhost (amavis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) ESMTP id i39JOY4S002194; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:24:34 +0200 Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (ante@ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) ESMTP id i39JOGrS002141; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:24:16 +0200 Received: from localhost (ante@localhost) with ESMTP id i39JOCQc002115; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:24:14 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: Tempo.Update.UU.SE: ante owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:24:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: Kent Stewart In-Reply-To: <200404091212.47377.kstewart@owt.com> Message-ID: References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <200404091212.47377.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:26:23 -0000 On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kent Stewart wrote: > Firefox depends on gtk-2.4.0, which depends on atk. All of these > problems relate back to updating dependancies of glib-2.4.0. Ok, that at least explains why atk seems so important. > The question at this point is what you updated and the order. If you > were starting out clean, a portupgrade -rR glib would have done most of > this but I wouldn't bet money. I eventually did a -rf glib to get > things built cleanly. Well, I started out with a clean 5.2-RELEASE and did cvsup 4 days ago. I don't remember seeing glib being upgraded, but I guess I could always try to '-rf glib' if it is a problem. It still don't tell me why I have no directory for atk, though... /andreas