From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 12:17:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F37B16A41C; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:17:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bloodwood.hunterlink.net.au (smtp-local.hunterlink.net.au [203.12.144.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060BA43D1F; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:17:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ppp2BE3.dyn.pacific.net.au (ppp2BE3.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.43.227]) by bloodwood.hunterlink.net.au (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j54CHZdg031782; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 22:17:36 +1000 From: Sam Lawrance To: Erwin Lansing In-Reply-To: <20050604114406.GF70125@droso.net> References: <200506040254.j542sFcL007764@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050604114406.GF70125@droso.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 22:18:31 +1000 Message-Id: <1117887511.758.33.camel@dirk.no.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/clip/files patch-cliplibs_clip-gtk2_Makefile.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:17:40 -0000 On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:44 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:54:15AM +0000, Sam Lawrance wrote: > > lawrance 2005-06-04 02:54:15 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Added files: > > databases/clip/files patch-cliplibs_clip-gtk2_Makefile.in > > Log: > > Add a patch missed on the last update. > > How can there be a previous update for a new file? > It can happen when a file is added, updated, then removed, then re-added again. Although, I don't think that's what you're really asking ;-) The log could have been clearer. What I meant was "add a patch missed on the last update to the port".