From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 10:47:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8478B16A4B3 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8235743FDF for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:47:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0891966DBA; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C7F3B8A; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:47:35 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <20031016174735.GA71812@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <16270.42776.767653.86364@whale.home-net> <00a401c393f2$6cf6fb00$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00a401c393f2$6cf6fb00$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current state of FreeBSD for AMD 64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:47:37 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:33:11PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > Does anyone have any details on the current state of AMD 64 support. There is a FreeBSD/amd64 mailingq list, you know :) > Been doing some digging but details are few and far between. > Key question is will the linux emulation support run amd64 compiled > exe's? Not yet. > Also dual or single only support? I think UP-only, but SMP support is coming soon. This is all in 5.1-CURRENT, so it's all experimental and not-for-production-use, etc. Kris --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/jtm3Wry0BWjoQKURAs3mAKCuYM876u1eVCB5PgkRMvt6OZlIfACffY32 WZrcngXytGTMBpgwDpXs524= =osm8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--