From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 15 03:20:50 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA26983 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 03:20:50 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA26974 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 03:20:46 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id DAA11737; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 03:20:41 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id DAA00179; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 03:20:41 -0800 Message-Id: <199503151120.DAA00179@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" cc: Denis Fortin , jg@euronet.nl, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Routing and Ethernet In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Mar 95 13:16:38 +0700." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 03:20:40 -0800 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The 700-800 kb/s limit for 3com509 is probably because 1) i measured this by ftp >transfers so actual rate can be more.2) We have here Twisted Pair made network >which is much more slow then coax... 1) FTP is *not* the way to measure performance. 2) 10BaseT has *exactly* the same performance as coax. -DG