From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 18:15:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA9DAFF for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bschmidt@techwires.net) Received: from mx.techwires.net (mx.techwires.net [IPv6:2001:4d88:100f:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540A2E21 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amy.lab.techwires.net (dslb-088-065-051-037.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.65.51.37]) by mx.techwires.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81C54309C66; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:15:45 +0100 (CET) From: Bernhard Schmidt To: "Dominik Wille" Subject: Re: Can't use 11n mode on my iwn wireless device Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:17:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-STABLE; KDE/4.9.5; amd64; ; ) References: <64712.91.23.56.46.1361453360.webmail@webmail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <64712.91.23.56.46.1361453360.webmail@webmail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302211917.05756.bschmidt@techwires.net> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:15:53 -0000 On Thursday, February 21, 2013 02:29:20 PM Dominik Wille wrote: > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 00:21:5c:02:eb:f7 > inet 192.168.178.76 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.178.255 > nd6 options=29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11ng > status: associated > ssid new_myhome channel 4 (2427 MHz 11g ht/20) bssid > f4:ec:38:e9:6a:f6 11g ht/20 <- that is 11n What makes you think you aren't connected via 11n? The Rates? Ignore those, ratectl reports the wrong rates being used. The bandwidth should match expected 11n rates though. -- Bernhard