From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 16 11:05:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E12716A4CE for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:05:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from home.mnet.bg (home.mnet.bg [193.110.223.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81C843D55 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpenev@mnet.bg) Received: from localhost (home [127.0.0.1]) by home.mnet.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DA53B322; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:05:51 +0300 (EEST) Received: from venus.dpsca.bg (ip220-81.mnet.bg [193.110.220.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by home.mnet.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C16E3B2FF; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:05:50 +0300 (EEST) Received: from earth.dpsca.bg (earth.dpsca.bg [192.168.1.1]) by venus.dpsca.bg (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9GB5cGP030763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:05:39 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from dpenev@localhost) by earth.dpsca.bg (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9GB5cii000787; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:05:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dpenev) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:05:38 +0300 From: Dancho Penev To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20041016110538.GA769@earth.dpsca.bg> References: <41708E81.5090901@yahoo.com.au> <20041016043119.GB81030@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041016043119.GB81030@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scan: smtp-vilter X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.1.5 X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.1.5 X-SMTP-Vilter-Backend: vilter-spamd X-SMTP-Vilter-Backend: vilter-clamd X-SMTP-Vilter-Status: clean X-Spam-Checker: smtp-vilter X-Spam-Threshold: 5.0 X-Spam-Probability: 0.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.1.0 (Debian GNU/Linux) at mail.mnet.bg cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ben Washington-Yule Subject: Re: Use pkg_delete or make deinstall? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:05:56 -0000 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:31:19PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: >Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:31:19 -0500 >From: Dan Nelson >To: Ben Washington-Yule >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Use pkg_delete or make deinstall? > >In the last episode (Oct 16), Ben Washington-Yule said: >> I've been wondering lately if there is any difference between the two=20 >> methods of removing software from the system; pkg_delete software-name= =20 >> and cd /usr/ports/catagory/software-name && make deinstall. This=20 >> question is not answered in the FAQ, I mainly ask out of curiousity. > >"make deinstall" just runs pkg_delete, so they're identical. It's important to know that "make deinstall" runs "pkg_delete -f ..." > >--=20 > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > --=20 Dancho Penev Home page: http://www.mnet.bg/~dpenev GnuGP public key: http://www.mnet.bg/~dpenev/gnupg.asc Key fingerprint: E88D 8B7B 3EF6 E9C8 C5D2 7554 2AA8 C347 71A1 4277 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBcQCCKqjDR3GhQncRAiuLAJ4uJAzDqNzRxPcaL3rPPAKxBIDg9wCfQotS zyU2PBlN/BwTtkpX7ZLTKLo= =rRPH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--