From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 23 14:41:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E91B37B401 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 14:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD9F43F93 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 14:41:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.147.188.198]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with ESMTP id <20030523214140051006d78je>; Fri, 23 May 2003 21:41:41 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h4NLfdFb010743; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:41:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h4NLfddB010740; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:41:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: boxend@swbell.net References: <3ECE4184.12834.92438A@localhost> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 23 May 2003 17:41:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3ECE4184.12834.92438A@localhost> Message-ID: <44smr5xrvx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs, buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 21:41:42 -0000 boxend@swbell.net writes: > I have 2 "slow" computers running freebsd, I have setup nfs to share > /usr/src and /usr/obj from a faster computer with the two slower. > When updating is there a need to buildworld on the slower computers > after buildworld on the fast? I think not, I have been skipping the buildworld, > I build the new kernel (custom kernel file for each), install kernel, then installworld on > the slower computers, without errors. The /etc/make.conf files are identical on the 3 > computers. What you're doing is fine.